Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:10

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why did McLaren hope that the Ferrari pair would pit twice during the Italian Grand Prix?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Is Russia’s evacuation of navy ships from Syria a sign of declining influence in the Middle East?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
NHL, NHLPA ensure labor peace after agreeing to 4-year extension to CBA through 2030 - Yahoo Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
New map shows Bay Area locations with highest risk of ember-driven wildfires - East Bay Times
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is it like to wear a kilt?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Immunotherapy Drugs Show Major Progress in Early-Stage Cancer - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Voyager IPO: Stock Rockets 84% Higher in Trading Debut - Barron's